Trust Center

Trust & auditability

SMA DIS helps engineers, researchers, founders, and technical teams move from early SMA concept uncertainty to a defensible screening record, evidence bundle, validation closure matrix, and design-review agenda.

SMA DIS is available for curated engineering pilots and paid feasibility review packages for teams evaluating Shape Memory Alloy concepts. Each assessment produces structured decision-support artifacts, including feasibility screening, evidence traceability, validation gaps, risk-to-test mapping, and exportable review records.

SMA DIS does not replace qualified engineering judgment, physical testing, regulatory review, flight qualification, medical approval, or certification. It helps teams understand what is known, what is assumed, what evidence supports the decision, and what must be tested before commitment.

Nigerian-American engineering manager reviewing Screening Record documents, benchmark registry, and audit checklists. — Educational photograph — illustrative context only, not a validated engineering prediction.

Methodology & corpus

Screening record: sma-screening-record.v1.1
Evidence corpus: — documents
Public benchmark registry
Reproducible assessments: the same inputs produce the same screening record

Calibration & conflicts

Confidence calibration: Still collecting live outcomes — scores are for review discussion, not success prediction · Calibration report
Knowledge conflict registry — literature disagreements surfaced on assessment
Evidence Challenge Mode — supporting, contradicting, and what-would-change sections

Research & university use

Live pilot evidence (honest metrics)

Registered users: 0
Assessments completed: 0
Outcomes recorded (live): 0
Simulated persona outcomes: 0
Simulated persona validation is tracked separately and excluded from commercial claims.
Phase 0 reviewer recruitment: pending ≥50 assessments

Public failure registry

Engineering companies publish failures. We do too.

POSTMORTEM-001 — NASA latch expert pilot — screening vs. expert review
Initial screening underestimated latch-specific constraint risks before independent expert review.

Confidence calibration report

Public review registry

Ten role-based SME coverage slots enrolled for screening review domains.

Medical NiTi SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Aerospace HT-SMA SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Fe-SMA civil SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Magnetic SMA / robotics SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
AM NiTi qualification SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Space latch SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
SMA Scientist SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Qualification SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Materials SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)
Deployment mechanism SME (role slot enrolled · screening reviewer role)

Governance audit artifacts available on request for procurement review.

Community reference deposit

Screening Record specification bundle prepared for Zenodo — DOI submission remains a manual stewardship step.

Community audit bundle

Enterprise pilots receive governance review, audit bundle exports, and Screening Record delivery for institutional diligence.

Request Enterprise Pilot quotation

Validation registry

Tracks validation plans, reviewer packets, and institutional sign-off readiness — informational until independent physics review signatures are recorded.

Join the waitlist

Governance charters

External reviews (including criticism)

Review 001 — Methodology & explainability (conditionally endorsed)
Review 002 — Audit & replay (suitable for internal design-review audit)
Review 003 — Liability & regulatory boundaries (defensible with expert SKU)

Security & SOC2 roadmap · Compliance · Status · Benchmark registry · IP & disclaimer policy

Educational photograph — illustrative context only, not a validated engineering prediction.